Home Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 1399
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 232-236

Correlation between anti-Müllerian and follicle-stimulating hormone in female infertility


1 Department of Biochemistry, PGIMS, Rohtak, India
2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, S.H.K Govt Medical College, Nalhar, Mewat, India
3 Department of Medicine, ESI, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication16-Oct-2014

Correspondence Address:
Yuthika Agrawal
C/O Mr. Jagdish Prasad Goyal, Near R.S. Sangwan Hospital, Ward no. 1, Loharu Road, Charkhi Dadri, Dist. Bhiwani, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-344X.143060

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Follicle development is dependent on the interrelationship of many hormones, such as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Mόllerian hormone (AMH). Ovary-specific expression in granulosa cells of growing nonselected follicles makes AMH an ideal marker for the size of the ovarian follicle pool. Thus, the objective was to study the variability of AMH during menstrual cycle and relationship between serum AMH and FSH in infertile women and to observe their relation with antral follicle count (AFC) as to determine, which is a better predictor of infertility. Materials and Methods: This study includes 75 infertile women in aged 30-40 years. Blood samples were taken at day three for serum AMH and FSH levels, and AFC was done. AMH was estimated again on day 14 of the menstrual cycle. Results: Mean serum AMH and FSH were 1.18 ± 0.57 ng/ml and 9.09 ± 2.51 mIU/ml on day three of menstrual cycle. Mean AMH levels on day fourteen was 1.12 ± 0.53 ng/ml, which was not significantly different from day three AMH level. There was a significant inverse relationship between serum AMH and FSH concentration (r = −0.488, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between AMH and AFC (r = 0.641, P < 0.001). Conclusion: There was a significant inverse correlation between serum AMH and FSH levels in infertile women and we consider AMH, a better predictor of ovarian reserve as it is relatively stable throughout the cycle. Furthermore, there is was positive correlation between AMH and AFC, denoting reduction of AMH levels in serum is the first indication of a decline in the follicular reserve.

Keywords: Anti-Mûllerian hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, infertility, antral follicle count, ovarian reserve


How to cite this article:
Bala J, Agrawal Y, Seth S, Goyal V, Kumar P. Correlation between anti-Müllerian and follicle-stimulating hormone in female infertility. Int J Health Allied Sci 2014;3:232-6

How to cite this URL:
Bala J, Agrawal Y, Seth S, Goyal V, Kumar P. Correlation between anti-Müllerian and follicle-stimulating hormone in female infertility. Int J Health Allied Sci [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Sep 20];3:232-6. Available from: http://www.ijhas.in/text.asp?2014/3/4/232/143060


  Introduction Top


The term "ovarian reserve" refers to the quantity and quality of a woman's current reservoir of oocytes and is closely associated with reproductive potential. It can be used as an indirect measure of a woman's reproductive age. [1]

Infertility refers to the inability of a woman to become pregnant after having unprotected intercourse for a specified amount of time, usually, within a year. [2] There are many factors that contribute to infertility, including, but not limited to the quantity and quality of the ovarian reserve. [2] However, a woman's age is not the only factor determining her ovarian reserve; decreases can occur at younger ages and be partially or totally responsible for infertility. [3] Couples struggling to become pregnant may consider fertility treatments, including multiple repeated tests, drugs and/or surgery. [2] Since treatments can be financially and emotionally draining, it is important to consider the patient's ability of becoming pregnant based on the limiting measures. Measurement of ovarian reserve is very important in predicting a woman's response to various fertility treatments and helps us decide on appropriate fertility medication dosage levels for that treatment. [2]

Follicle development is dependent on the interrelationship of many hormones, such as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Mûllerian hormone (AMH), secreted from the anterior pituitary gland and the ovaries respectively. Abnormal levels of these hormones may indicate a woman's diminished ability or inability of conception. [2]

The woman's age and assays of serum FSH in the early follicular phase were among the earliest and most useful parameters used for evaluation of ovarian reserve. [4],[5] Various ultra-sound parameters are also used for evaluation of ovarian reserve, including ovarian volume [6],[7] and the antral follicle count (AFC), with varying degrees of reliability. [8],[9]

Low levels of FSH are seen during follicle development and high levels during ovulation. The variation in levels of FSH is due to a feedback loop that exists between the hormones secreted from the ovaries and pituitary gland. [3]

Follicle stimulating hormone level also depends on the estradiol (E2) level. As antral follicles develop in the ovaries, they excrete E2 and inhibin B. An increase in these hormones signals the gonadotropins in the pituitary gland to discontinue the release of FSH. Once ovulation occurs there is a decrease in E2, which signals for an increase of serum FSH, which helps to prepare for the next cohort of follicles in the growing pool. This accounts for variability of FSH during the menstrual cycle. Day three FSH has been the most used test of ovarian reserve and has been the standard way of determining ovarian reserve, providing greatest accuracy. [2]

The measurement of serum AMH level is a relatively new method that is being considered for determination of the ovarian reserve, giving a more direct and accurate measurement. In women, AMH is produced by the granulosa cells (GC) of follicles. It is produced from the stage of the primary follicle to the initial formation of the antrum, thus is distinct from ovulation and is a step closer to being able to assess the true ovarian reserve [10] as AMH appears to accurately measure the active follicle pool, as active follicles only produce AMH. This is the basis of using AMH for determining ovarian reserve. [3]

La Marca et al. showed that serum AMH level, unlike other ovarian reserve tests, do not change significantly throughout the menstrual cycle. [11] Other studies have also confirmed that the intercycle and intracycle variability of serum AMH levels is very low enough, to allow random timing of AMH measurement during the menstrual cycle. Hence, it has been suggested that serum AMH values are more convenient and more effective than other serum ovarian reserve tests like FSH and inhibin B or E2. [12] It is said to be the best single indicator of response to fertility drugs. Several studies have shown that serum AMH is an excellent marker to determine ovarian responsiveness in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. AMH serum levels were also shown to correlate with the number of oocytes retrieved upon ovarian stimulation. [13]

Therefore, we have planned this study to determine the variability in the levels of serum AMH on two different days of menstrual cycle and observe the relationship between serum AMH and FSH (which is traditional marker of ovarian reserve) levels in infertile women and their relation with AFC as to determine which is a better predictor of infertility.


  Materials and methods Top


The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the institute in which the study was carried out. All patients were recruited after obtaining informed consent. The study was a prospective study, conducted in the outpatient unit in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PGIMS Rohtak between June 2013 and June 2014. The study included 75 infertile females with poor ovarian reserve. The group was recruited by purposive sampling. Information about body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption, chronological age, age at menarche, menstrual cycle was recorded using a case report form.

Women attending obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient department with complaints of infertility were evaluated for poor ovarian reserve by transvaginal sonography (TVS). Infertility was defined as the inability of a woman to become pregnant after having unprotected intercourse for a specified amount of time, usually, within a year. [2] Poor ovarian reserve was defined as the number of early antral follicles 2-10 mm in diameter on TVS. [14] 75 infertile women positive for above findings and meeting the following criteria were included in the study: (i) 30-40 year age (ii) regular, ovulatory menstrual cycles every 25-35 days; (iii) both ovaries present; (iv) no current or past diseases affecting ovaries or sex steroid secretion, clearance or excretion; (v) a BMI < 25 kg/m 2 ; (vi) no current hormone therapy; and (vii) adequate visualization of ovaries at TVS.

Women presenting with polycystic ovary syndrome were excluded from the study.

Blood samples were taken on day three of the menstrual cycle in all women. Serum was assayed for FSH and AMH concentration. Sample was taken again on 14 days of the menstrual cycle in these women and analysed for AMH. Serum levels of AMH were determined by a the ultrasensitive AMH/Müllerian inhibiting substance enzyme linked immunosorbent assay [15] and FSH is estimated by ADVIA Centaur CP autoanalyzer by chemi-luminescence immunoassay. [16]

Statistical analysis

Analysis was performed using the latest available SPSS version for Windows. The results are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The comparison between AMH level on day 3 and day 14 of the menstrual cycle was done by t-test. Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis was conducted between serum AMH, serum FSH level and AFC. P <0.05 was considered as significant.


  Results Top


The mean age of infertile females with diminished ovarian reserve was 35.39 ± 2.46 years. Mean FSH level in these 75 infertile women was 9.10 ± 2.51 mIU/ml, with a range of 4-15.6 mIU/ml. The mean AMH level on day 3 was 1.18 ± 0.58 ng/ml, with a range of 0.3-2.7 ng/ml and that on day 14 was 1.12 ± 0.53 ng/ml. Other baseline characteristics of infertile women are shown in [Table 1]. Comparison of mean of AMH on day 3 and day 14 was not statistically different. Although AMH and FSH are not directly dependent on each other, there was a significant inverse relationship between serum AMH concentrations and serum FSH concentration (r = −0.448, P < 0.001) was taken on day 3 of menstrual cycle. This correlation is shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Relationship between serum anti-Müllerian hormone and follicle stimulating hormone

Click here to view
Table 1: Baseline characteristic of study group

Click here to view


A positive correlation was found between AMH and AFC (r = 0.641, P < 0.001) was found, but not between FSH and AFC (r = −0.174, P = 0.135) as shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Relationship between serum anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count (r2 = 0.411, P < 0.001)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The presumed linkage in the relationship between baseline FSH and random AMH is that both hormones are indicators of ovarian reserve. The present study was meant to infer the variability of AMH during the menstrual cycle and that, if there is a direct feedback mechanism between these two hormones; rather, to find a relationship between their levels and with AFC, and we believe that they are independent indicators of ovarian reserve.

Baseline FSH level increases in infertility and our study also shows mean FSH level is 9.1 ± 2.51 mIU/ml, which is on the higher side. These Baseline FSH levels have for many years been used to predict a patient's response to ovulation induction and success with IVF. [17] Determinations of FSH, however, are characterized by many difficulties. One quite obvious problem is the inconvenience of a required blood draw on the day 2 or 3 of menses. The second issue of concern is the degree of cycle-to-cycle fluctuation in baseline FSH levels, at least partially caused by the dependency of FSH levels on the negative feedback from E2 levels. [2]

Anti-Müllerian hormone does not exhibit these difficulties. It is relatively stable throughout the cycle [11],[18],[19],[20] and therefore can be drawn at random. This is also evident by our study results which show AMH levels are not statistically different on day 3 and day 14 of the menstrual cycle. This makes serum AMH a more reliable test, as it is not constrained to a time frame for measurement. It is also said not to be affected by other hormonal variations, including the use of oral contraceptives. [21],[22]

In our study, we have noted a significant inverse correlation between serum AMH and subsequent baseline FSH on day 3 within the same menstrual cycle (r = −0.488, P < 0.001), which is similar to as previously noted in some other studies. [23] Serum FSH level on the third day of the menstrual cycle ensures the greatest accuracy possible. [2] AMH null mice with low FSH levels was seen to present with a large number of growing follicles. This fact led to the hypothesis that, in the absence of AMH, follicles show a tendency to become more sensitive to FSH action. [24] Further, it has been reported that FSH and E2 down-regulate AMH gene expression in GC of rat follicles. [25] Thus, serum AMH level can, therefore, be used as a reliable biomarker of ovarian reserve (similar to serum FSH levels). [26] Another study similar to our study also reported that serum AMH concentration shows a negative linear correlation with basal FSH levels in women who have a poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation with human gonadotropins. [27]

Our study shows a positive correlation between AMH and AFC (r = 0.641, P < 0.001) but not between FSH and AFC. It has been shown that compared with the indirect measurement of serum FSH, serum AMH also has a higher positive correlation of the oocyte count investigated in a study of IVF patients. [28] Shebl et al. showed a correlation between serum AMH level and the quality of the oocytes retrieved from the ovary after hyperstimlation. [29] AMH knock-out mice showed three times more small non-atretic growing follicles, and a reduced number of primordial follicles compared with wild mice. [24] AMH in serum is said to be a direct measure of the primordial follicles that are available and show a decrease in the available pool before any other method, providing a huge advantage. A decrease in serum AMH level is detected 5 years before a difference in the serum levels of FSH or inhibin B is noticed. [2] It has been reported that one of the advantages of serum AMH over other measures may be that it gives an earlier indication of a declining ovarian reserve. Although the present analysis does not address the utility of a random serum AMH value to predict cycle outcomes, but we can surely conclude AMH's role as a peripheral signal of the size of the growing follicle pool. Thus, the possible explanation to our result can be that most of the decrease in AFC in the initial years, which correlated only with AMH, but not with FSH.

Better understanding of a patient's AMH status would allow for physicians to create a better treatment plan for the infertile patient. Therefore, AMH may be used in conjunction with ultrasonography to ensure the best possible outcomes, though it is undecided if the levels of serum AMH are an indicator of the quantity of the follicles or the quality in terms of the follicle maturity. [30]


  Conclusion Top


Mean serum FSH levels were 9.10 ± 2.51 mIU/mL, which is in the higher range, as occurs in infertility. There was a significant inverse correlation between serum AMH and FSH levels in infertile women and we consider serum AMH, a better predictor of ovarian reserve as it is relatively stable throughout the cycle and can be assayed at different time during the cycle. Our study shows a positive correlation between AMH and AFC (r = 0.641, P < 0.001), but not between FSH and AFC denoting reduction of AMH levels in serum is the first indication of a decline in the follicular reserve of the ovaries.

The results reported here may not apply to other female populations as in this study females selected had diminished ovarian reserve. Future studies of the correlation between serum FSH and AMH should be conducted using normally fertile women.

 
  References Top

1.
Gupta S, Sharma D, Surti N, Kesavan S, Khanna P, Agarwal A. Ovarian reserve testing: Systematic review of the literature. Arch Med Sci 2009;5:S143-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Iverson A, Younis A, Butler WJ, Roudebush WE. Inverse correspondence of AMH and FSH levels in women presenting for infertility treatment. J South Carol Acad Sci 2011;9:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Themmen AP. Anti-Müllerian hormone: A new marker for ovarian function. Reproduction 2006;131:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tan SL, Royston P, Campbell S, Jacobs HS, Betts J, Mason B, et al. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 1992;339:1390-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Toner JP, Philput CB, Jones GS, Muasher SJ. Basal follicle-stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age. Fertil Steril 1991;55:784-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997;12:294-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Syrop CH, Willhoite A, Van Voorhis BJ. Ovarian volume: A novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1167-71.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nahum R, Shifren JL, Chang Y, Leykin L, Isaacson K, Toth TL. Antral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVF - is it a better predictor than age and FSH? J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:151-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: A prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2002;77:328-36.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Anderson RA. What does anti-Müllerian hormone tell you about ovarian function? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;77:652-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3103-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Broer SL, Eijkemans MJ, Scheffer GJ, van Rooij IA, de Vet A, Themmen AP, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone predicts menopause: A long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:2532-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Karkanaki A, Vosnakis C, Panidis D. The clinical significance of anti-Müllerian hormone evaluation in gynecological endocrinology. Hormones (Athens) 2011;10:95-103.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Deb S, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Raine-Fenning NJ. Quantitative analysis of antral follicle number and size: A comparison of two-dimensional and automated three-dimensional ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:354-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wallace AM, Faye SA, Fleming R, Nelson SM. A multicentre evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay (AMH Gen II). Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:370-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rojanasakul A, Udomsubpayakul U, Chinsomboon S. Chemiluminescence immunoassay versus radioimmunoassay for the measurement of reproductive hormones. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994;45:141-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Scott RT, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Robinson S, Rosenwaks Z. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;51:651-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hehenkamp WJ, Looman CW, Themmen AP, de Jong FH, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4057-63.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Tsepelidis S, Devreker F, Demeestere I, Flahaut A, Gervy Ch, Englert Y. Stable serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone during the menstrual cycle: A prospective study in normo-ovulatory women. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1837-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
La Marca A, Giulini S, Tirelli A, Bertucci E, Marsella T, Xella S, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2007;22:766-71.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Streuli I, Fraisse T, Pillet C, Ibecheole V, Bischof P, de Ziegler D. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels remain stable throughout the menstrual cycle and after oral or vaginal administration of synthetic sex steroids. Fertil Steril 2008;90:395-400.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Somunkiran A, Yavuz T, Yucel O, Ozdemir I. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels during hormonal contraception in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;134:196-201.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
De Vet A, Laven JS, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Fauser BC. Anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels: A putative marker for ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 2002;77:357-62.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Cate RL, Mattaliano RJ, Hession C, Tizard R, Farber NM, Cheung A, et al. Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Müllerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells. Cell 1986;45:685-98.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Behringer RR. The in vivo roles of Müllerian-inhibiting substance. Curr Top Dev Biol 1994;29:171-87.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Tremellen KP, Kolo M, Gilmore A, Lekamge DN. Anti-mullerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:20-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Singer T, Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Correlation of anti-Müllerian hormone and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2616-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Muttukrishna S, Suharjono H, McGarrigle H, Sathanandan M. Inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormone: Markers of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI patients? BJOG 2004;111:1248-53.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shebl O, Ebner T, Sir A, Schreier-Lechner E, Mayer RB, Tews G, et al. Age-related distribution of basal serum AMH level in women of reproductive age and a presumably healthy cohort. Fertil Steril 2011;95:832-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, Rabinowitz R, Markowitz E, Mimoni T, et al. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 2005;20:3178-83.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4120    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded340    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal